Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
`ARCH_HAVE_RAMFUNCS` has no actual effect on the ESP32-C3,
but ESP32-C3 has RAM functions, so select it to mark that is OK,
and then we can also suppress the RWX memory region warning.
Signed-off-by: Huang Qi <huangqi3@xiaomi.com>
* It seems that they assume up_putc() and syslog() outputs to the
same device. Depending on the system and configurations, it's wrong.
* They are wrapped with "#if 0" and unused.
Fixes https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/14694
when client read and poll wait buffer from server side and server side may
poll notify more than one times, then rpmsgdev in client side will call
"rpmsgdev_poll_setup(priv, 0, false);" twice which will cause crash in
vela rpmsgdev_server.c
Signed-off-by: rongyichang <rongyichang@xiaomi.com>
the msg count is not changed while iov len is increased.
which may cause the buffer reply by server is bigger than
msg count
Signed-off-by: rongyichang <rongyichang@xiaomi.com>
Some armv7-m-based SoCs do not work with atomic instructions,
even though armv7-m supports them.
To avoid using atomic instructions generated by gcc,
CONFIG_LIBC_ARCH_ATOMIC is newly introduced with which
arch_atomic.c is linked explicitly.
However, the function names need to be changed to avoid
build errors, since the functions described in stdatomic.h
are gcc built-in and inlined when the code is compiled.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Miyasita <Takuya.Miyashita@sony.com>
This would avoid the undesirable intertactions with the serial driver
described in https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/14662.
Although I'm not entirely happy with this fix because it assumes
the particular implementations of up_putc/up_nputc and its association
to the serial devices, I haven't come up with better ideas for now.
An alternative is to place some serializations inside the target
specific serial (and/or whatever provides up_putc api) implementaitons.
But it isn't too attractive to put potentially complex logic into the
low-level machinaries, especially when we have a lot of similar copies
of it.
Another alternative is to deprecate up_putc. (at least for the purpose
of syslog.) But it seems at least some of users are relying on what
the current implementation provides heavily.
This commit also removes g_lowputs_lock because the critical section
would serve the purpose of the lock as well.
added shell script darwin_arm64.sh for macOS Apple Silicon
updated toolchains for macOS on Apple Silicon
- arm64
- aarch64
- xpack-riscv
- xtensa-esp32
Suppress the warning message "nuttx has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions" in case of RAM boot mode is selected.
RAM MODE: BOOT_RUNFROMEXTSRAM/BOOT_RUNFROMISRAM/BOOT_RUNFROMSDRAM/BOOT_COPYTORAM
Signed-off-by: Huang Qi <huangqi3@xiaomi.com>
with greenhills version older than 202354, the __attribute__((naked))
cannot handled by greenhills compiler, and will report warning:
"/home/guoshichao/work_profile/vela_os/vela_car_6/nuttx/arch/arm/src/armv7-m/arm_svcall.c", line 79: warning #1097-D:
unknown attribute "naked"
static void dispatch_syscall(void) naked_function;
^
Signed-off-by: guoshichao <guoshichao@xiaomi.com>
