When supporting high-priority interrupts, updating the
g_running_tasks within a high-priority interrupt may be
cause problems. The g_running_tasks should only be updated
when it is determined that a task context switch has occurred.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
In the current implementation of other architectures, it is not really implemented to preserve the context, so it is emulated from other architectures to clear the context.
If this behavior is not implemented, it will cause the xtensa architecture processor to loop assert in the active assert case
Signed-off-by: chenrun1 <chenrun1@xiaomi.com>
to avoid the infinite recusive dispatch:
*0 myhandler (signo=27, info=0xf3e38b9c, context=0x0) at ltp/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sigqueue/7-1.c:39
*1 0x58f1c39e in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:167
*2 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*3 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049334) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*4 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049334) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*5 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*6 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*7 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*8 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049304) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*9 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049304) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*10 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*11 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*12 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*13 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492d4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*14 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492d4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*15 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*16 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*17 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*18 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492a4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*19 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492a4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*20 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*21 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*22 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*23 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049274) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*24 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049274) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*25 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*26 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*27 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*28 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049244) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*29 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049244) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*30 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*31 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
in SMP, signal processing cannot be nested, we use xcp.sigdeliver to identify whether there is currently a signal being processed, but this state does not match the actual situation
One possible scenario is that signal processing has already been completed, but an interrupt occurs, resulting in xcp.sigdeliver not being correctly set to NULL,
At this point, a new signal arrives, which can only be placed in the queue and cannot be processed immediately
Our solution is that signal processing and signal complete status are set in the same critical section, which can ensure status synchronization
Signed-off-by: hujun5 <hujun5@xiaomi.com>
1. Get the value of sp from dump regs when an exception occurs,
to avoid getting the value of fp from up_getsp and causing
incomplete stack printing.
2. Determine which stack the value belongs to based on the value
of SP to avoid false reports of stack overflow
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
CURRENT_REGS may change during assert handling, so pass
in the 'regs' parameter at the entry point of _assert.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
The Inter-Processor Interrupt that pauses the other CPU generates
a level-1 interrupt which sets the PS.EXCM. This level-1 interrupt
is treated as an Exception and the bit PS.EXCM bit is automatically
reset on return from Exception. However, this is not the case here
because we are changing the execution to the signal trampoline.
Restoring the PS register with the PS.EXCM bit set would cause any
other exception to deviate execution to the DEC (double exception
vector), avoiding it to be treated correctly. According to the
xtensa ISA: "The process of taking an interrupt does not clear
the interrupt request. The process does set PS.EXCM to 1, which
disables level-1 interrupts in the interrupt handler. Typically,
the PS.EXCM is reset to 0 by the handler, after it has set up the
stack frame and masked the interrupt." Clean the saved PS.EXCM to
1) avoid an exception from being properly treated and 2) avoid
interrupts to be masked while delivering the signal.
Summary:
- Support arm64 pmu api, Currently only the cycle counter function is supported.
- Using ARM64 PMU hardware capability to implement perf interface, modify all
perf interface related code.
- Support for pmu init under smp.
Signed-off-by: wangming9 <wangming9@xiaomi.com>
It takes about 10 cycles to obtain the task list according to the task
status. In most cases, we know the task status, so we can directly
add the task from the specified task list to reduce time consuming.
It takes about 10 cycles to obtain the task list according to the task
status. In most cases, we know the task status, so we can directly
delete the task from the specified task list to reduce time consuming.
Situation:
Assume we have 2 cpus, and busy run task0.
CPU0 CPU1
task0 -> task1 task2 -> task0
1. remove task0 form runninglist
2. take task1 as new tcb
3. add task0 to blocklist
4. clear spinlock
4.1 remove task2 form runninglist
4.2 take task0 as new tcb
4.3 add task2 to blocklist
4.4 use svc ISR swith to task0
4.5 crash
5. use svc ISR swith to task1
Fix:
Move clear spinlock to the end of svc ISR
Signed-off-by: ligd <liguiding1@xiaomi.com>
