mirror of
https://github.com/apache/nuttx.git
synced 2026-10-16 02:32:22 +00:00
Lower part of STM32 CAN driver arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_can.c uses all three hw tx mailboxes and clears TXFP bit in the CAN_MCR register (it means transmission order is defined by identifier and mailbox number). This creates situation when order frames are put in upper part of CAN driver (via can_write) and order frames are sent on bus can be different (and I experience this in wild). Since CAN driver API pretends to be "file like" I expect data to be read from fd the same order it is written. So I consider described behaviour to be a bug. I propose either to set TXFP bit in the CAN_MCR register (FIFO transmit order) or to use only one mailbox. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| include | ||
| src | ||
| Kconfig | ||