Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wangmingrong1
c6da553788 kasan: kasan_reset_tag rename kasan_clear_tag
The clear tag is more explicit than the reset tag.

Signed-off-by: wangmingrong1 <wangmingrong1@xiaomi.com>
2025-06-30 18:19:38 +08:00
Xiang Xiao
60fb917eda Remove FAR from 32/64bit arch
since these arch doesn't distinguish between near and far pointers

Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
2024-12-05 22:55:39 +08:00
wangmingrong1
300ce45365 libc/machine: Fix the error caused by tag kasan
Use address addition and subtraction, no longer as the return value of the address. Tags must be removed before calculation

Signed-off-by: wangmingrong1 <wangmingrong1@xiaomi.com>
2024-10-11 01:29:56 +08:00
Alin Jerpelea
6b5dddd5d7 libs/libc: migrate to SPDX identifier
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.

Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
2024-10-01 12:25:52 +08:00
Ville Juven
996625ec58 riscv/arch_elf.c: Handle PCREL_HI20/LO12_I/S relocations correctly
There is a problem with the current elf loader for risc-v: when a pair of
PCREL_HI20 / LO12 relocations are encountered, it is assumed that these
will follow each other immediately, as follows:

label:
	auipc      a0, %pcrel_hi(symbol)    // R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20
	load/store a0, %pcrel_lo(label)(a0) // R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I/S

With this assumption, the hi/lo relocations are both done when a hi20
relocation entry is encountered, first to the current instruction (addr)
and to the next instruction (addr + 4).

However, this assumption is wrong. There is nothing in the elf relocation
specification[1] that mandates this. Thus, the hi/lo relocation always
needs to first fixup the hi-part, and when the lo-part is encountered, it
needs to find the corresponding hi relocation entry, via the given "label".
This necessitates (re-)visiting the relocation entries for the current
section as well as looking for "label" in the symbol table.

The NuttX elf loader does not allow such operations to be done in the
machine specific part, so this patch fixes the relocation issue by
introducing an architecture specific cache for the hi20 relocation and
symbol table entries. When a lo12 relocation is encountered, the cache
can be consulted to find the hi20 part.

[1] https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc
2023-12-12 17:32:36 -08:00
dongjiuzhu1
489bd15271 arch/arm64: support relocate for aarch64
Signed-off-by: dongjiuzhu1 <dongjiuzhu1@xiaomi.com>
2023-10-30 18:20:22 +08:00